Comments on: The Ad Exchange Model (Part III) http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/ Ramblings about online advertising, ad networks & other techie randomness Wed, 28 May 2014 09:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: repair powerpoint files http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-147529 repair powerpoint files Thu, 24 May 2012 10:34:00 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-147529 Great post Nice one thanks. Great post Nice one thanks.

]]>
By: Actual Zip Repair http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-147345 Actual Zip Repair Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:07:00 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-147345 Thanks a lot. You article is very informative. Thanks a lot. You article is very informative.

]]>
By: The New Display Ecosystem, Part I: A Few Words on HYPE http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-146882 The New Display Ecosystem, Part I: A Few Words on HYPE Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:06:39 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-146882 [...] most popular series of blog posts of all time — “The Ad Exchange Model” (part 1, part 2 and part 3). Since then a lot has happened. A whole slew of three letter acronyms has appeared: DSP, SSP, DSP, [...] [...] most popular series of blog posts of all time — “The Ad Exchange Model” (part 1, part 2 and part 3). Since then a lot has happened. A whole slew of three letter acronyms has appeared: DSP, SSP, DSP, [...]

]]>
By: Somesh http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-136235 Somesh Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:53:28 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-136235 Mike, Now that more than 3 years have passed since the post, can you pls update the post on what actually has happened in the value chain, how have ad exchanges evolved and what effect did they have on ad networks, publishers and advertisers? Would be very helpful to know. Regards Mike,

Now that more than 3 years have passed since the post, can you pls update the post on what actually has happened in the value chain, how have ad exchanges evolved and what effect did they have on ad networks, publishers and advertisers? Would be very helpful to know.

Regards

]]>
By: Annie http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-59624 Annie Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:05:45 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-59624 Great site, love your writing style. Great site, love your writing style.

]]>
By: Guaranteed http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-58316 Guaranteed Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:42:27 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-58316 I have been searching on the net for guaranteed and end up visiting your site. I really like the posts here, especially this one regarding The Ad Exchange Model (Part III). I already bookmarked your site and sure visit again. I have been searching on the net for guaranteed and end up visiting your site. I really like the posts here, especially this one regarding The Ad Exchange Model (Part III). I already bookmarked your site and sure visit again.

]]>
By: Mike http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-257 Mike Fri, 04 May 2007 21:36:41 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-257 Thanks for the feedback Greg, lotta good points. The one thing I will disagree with is the financial market stockbroker analogy. Hedge funds thrive on their models, this is how they arb. That doesn't necessarily translate to the Exchange model, unless you integrate your model with the exchange -- at which point you essentially become a technology provider. There will simply be too much data and too many different transactions to do too much offline modeling. Although -- I will refute my point that on the premium side of things this might actually work. It might well be possible that arbitragers will assume risk on inventory. E.g., place a buy for the next month at a flat rate assuming that they will be able to sell it at a higher price later. Assuming publishers are risk-averse, in that they would rather take a lower guaranteed price today than have a higher potential payoff, this might become a very lucrative market. Thanks for the feedback Greg, lotta good points.

The one thing I will disagree with is the financial market stockbroker analogy. Hedge funds thrive on their models, this is how they arb. That doesn’t necessarily translate to the Exchange model, unless you integrate your model with the exchange — at which point you essentially become a technology provider. There will simply be too much data and too many different transactions to do too much offline modeling.

Although — I will refute my point that on the premium side of things this might actually work. It might well be possible that arbitragers will assume risk on inventory. E.g., place a buy for the next month at a flat rate assuming that they will be able to sell it at a higher price later. Assuming publishers are risk-averse, in that they would rather take a lower guaranteed price today than have a higher potential payoff, this might become a very lucrative market.

]]>
By: Greg http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-255 Greg Fri, 04 May 2007 20:20:11 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/05/04/the-ad-exchange-model-part-iii/#comment-255 Nice post. I definitely see a large role in the future for any agency providing management services, but I don't think you're going to see rapid consolidation to a single company per exchange. Think of them as the equivalent of stockbrokers -- they all essentially do the same thing, yet there's an absolute ton of them. It'd surprise me if arbitrageurs were to suffer unduly as the exchange model rises in popularity. More efficiency = greater volume = more volume to arbitrage. (There's tons of arbitrageurs on the financial exchanges, which are more efficient than we'll ever hope to be simply because the goods are fungible.) You'll go from parties making fat margins on a little traffic to thinner ones on a lot of traffic, that's all. Ultimately, any company with a decent creative department has nothing to fear from an exchange -- targeting and optimization will only take you so far if your ads suck. There's always going to be a market for ads and landing pages that convert. That, incidentally, is one of the biggest reasons why lead generators like LowerMyBills.com are successful, not because "it's because it’s incredibly difficult for one financial services company to sell their services online." Some banks have ridiculously good lead generation departments in-house. Nice post.

I definitely see a large role in the future for any agency providing management services, but I don’t think you’re going to see rapid consolidation to a single company per exchange. Think of them as the equivalent of stockbrokers — they all essentially do the same thing, yet there’s an absolute ton of them.

It’d surprise me if arbitrageurs were to suffer unduly as the exchange model rises in popularity. More efficiency = greater volume = more volume to arbitrage. (There’s tons of arbitrageurs on the financial exchanges, which are more efficient than we’ll ever hope to be simply because the goods are fungible.) You’ll go from parties making fat margins on a little traffic to thinner ones on a lot of traffic, that’s all.

Ultimately, any company with a decent creative department has nothing to fear from an exchange — targeting and optimization will only take you so far if your ads suck. There’s always going to be a market for ads and landing pages that convert. That, incidentally, is one of the biggest reasons why lead generators like LowerMyBills.com are successful, not because “it’s because it’s incredibly difficult for one financial services company to sell their services online.” Some banks have ridiculously good lead generation departments in-house.

]]>