<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adotas Premium v. Remnant Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/10/adotas-premium-v-remnant-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/10/adotas-premium-v-remnant-series/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about online advertising, ad networks &#038; other techie randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:51:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Shay</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/10/adotas-premium-v-remnant-series/comment-page-1/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>David Shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/10/adotas-premium-v-remnant-series/#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike -- Totally dig all your stuff on Premium v. Remnant and very glad that this topic is getting a lot of attention. By way of full disclosure, I am VP of Marketing for CPX Interactive, an ad network proactively focused on monetizing &quot;remnant&quot; inventory (as well as &quot;premium&quot;, of course.) Anyway, worth mentioning is that on reason these terms came into being is that there is a conceit in the industry (true or not) that the first few pages/impressions seen by a user are more are more likely to be clicked, and are therefore worth more (read as --- are more premium) then the users 5th, 6th, 7th...etc... page/impression on the same site visit. Our CEO addressed this well in this in this blog post: http://cpxinteractive.com/cpxBlog/index.php?/archives/12-Lower-Tier-Networks-Revisited-An-Untapped-Opportunity.html the original high profile ad networks 

Also, it is worth noting that the growth of &quot;remnant&quot; inventory is making mainstream headlines. At the risk of a shameless plug, here is a CNBC feature on CPX, specifically on point. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFp0N2FX-3w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike &#8212; Totally dig all your stuff on Premium v. Remnant and very glad that this topic is getting a lot of attention. By way of full disclosure, I am VP of Marketing for CPX Interactive, an ad network proactively focused on monetizing &#8220;remnant&#8221; inventory (as well as &#8220;premium&#8221;, of course.) Anyway, worth mentioning is that on reason these terms came into being is that there is a conceit in the industry (true or not) that the first few pages/impressions seen by a user are more are more likely to be clicked, and are therefore worth more (read as &#8212; are more premium) then the users 5th, 6th, 7th&#8230;etc&#8230; page/impression on the same site visit. Our CEO addressed this well in this in this blog post: <a href="http://cpxinteractive.com/cpxBlog/index.php?/archives/12-Lower-Tier-Networks-Revisited-An-Untapped-Opportunity.html" rel="nofollow">http://cpxinteractive.com/cpxBlog/index.php?/archives/12-Lower-Tier-Networks-Revisited-An-Untapped-Opportunity.html</a> the original high profile ad networks </p>
<p>Also, it is worth noting that the growth of &#8220;remnant&#8221; inventory is making mainstream headlines. At the risk of a shameless plug, here is a CNBC feature on CPX, specifically on point. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFp0N2FX-3w" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFp0N2FX-3w</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
