<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Advertising is too Stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about online advertising, ad networks &#038; other techie randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hitt</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t have more relevant ad-context-matching because many involved in advertising only see a campaign from a single prospective.

I&#039;ve been working with clients to look at advertising on-line as a navigational tool, like direct response advertising is off-line.  An ads purpose goes from &quot;look at me&quot; to &quot;use me to get what you want.&quot;

An advertising network I manage maintains a strong 0.5% to 1.0% CTR -- but that means turning away many advertising dollars.  A client&#039;s network pushing 25 million impressions a day with only a 0.01% to 0.02% CTR -- they accept anyone who will ante up.

(As an advertiser, I want the CTR!  As a publisher, I want the CPM money without the CPA risk!)

Publishers can get more relevant ads by focusing their sites and being more selective with advertisers to choose them around customers interests.  This means being a guardian of the visitors experience, rather than the upfront gain of accepting who ever can pay.

With higher CTR, you&#039;ll find you can make the same money with fewer resources than a high impression network.  Plus, users won&#039;t consider your ads as advertising because they will better serve their interests.

Best,

Justin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t have more relevant ad-context-matching because many involved in advertising only see a campaign from a single prospective.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been working with clients to look at advertising on-line as a navigational tool, like direct response advertising is off-line.  An ads purpose goes from &#8220;look at me&#8221; to &#8220;use me to get what you want.&#8221;</p>
<p>An advertising network I manage maintains a strong 0.5% to 1.0% CTR &#8212; but that means turning away many advertising dollars.  A client&#8217;s network pushing 25 million impressions a day with only a 0.01% to 0.02% CTR &#8212; they accept anyone who will ante up.</p>
<p>(As an advertiser, I want the CTR!  As a publisher, I want the CPM money without the CPA risk!)</p>
<p>Publishers can get more relevant ads by focusing their sites and being more selective with advertisers to choose them around customers interests.  This means being a guardian of the visitors experience, rather than the upfront gain of accepting who ever can pay.</p>
<p>With higher CTR, you&#8217;ll find you can make the same money with fewer resources than a high impression network.  Plus, users won&#8217;t consider your ads as advertising because they will better serve their interests.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/#comment-4142</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very true, I feel very behind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very true, I feel very behind <img src='http://www.mikeonads.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/14/online-advertising-is-too-stupid/#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>First time on Pandora!?  You work too much dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First time on Pandora!?  You work too much dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
