Comments on: Redirects and Integration, Part I: Limitations http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/ Ramblings about online advertising, ad networks & other techie randomness Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:29:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Mike On Ads » Blog Archive » Redirects and Integration, Part II: Hacking Around the Browser http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/comment-page-1/#comment-34444 Mike On Ads » Blog Archive » Redirects and Integration, Part II: Hacking Around the Browser Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:42:35 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/#comment-34444 [...] Redirects and Integration, Part I: Limitations [...] [...] Redirects and Integration, Part I: Limitations [...]

]]> By: Mukul Kumar http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/comment-page-1/#comment-28617 Mukul Kumar Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:57:11 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/#comment-28617 I am not sure what the conclusion is here. The response time in the latter case is 1530ms and in the former case is 1020ms. Also, let’s say we send parallel requests to Network-A and Network-B, then both these networks can count the impression thereby double counting the impressions thereby decreasing the eCPM; what am I missing here? I am not sure what the conclusion is here. The response time in the latter case is 1530ms and in the former case is 1020ms.

Also, let’s say we send parallel requests to Network-A and Network-B, then both these networks can count the impression thereby double counting the impressions thereby decreasing the eCPM; what am I missing here?

]]> By: gpapilion http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/comment-page-1/#comment-28117 gpapilion Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:32:54 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/#comment-28117 This is a very similar to how mobile ad serving works, since most 'mobile browsers' can't execute javascript. This is a very similar to how mobile ad serving works, since most ‘mobile browsers’ can’t execute javascript.

]]> By: Mike http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/comment-page-1/#comment-25910 Mike Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:45:56 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/#comment-25910 Left this comment on Greg's blog as well: Love the feedback Greg. You're absolutely right that I forgot to mention the main *reason* why we have redirects -- cookies. It's also a huge limitation to fixing this problem, something I'm hoping to cover in the next two posts on the topic. Left this comment on Greg’s blog as well:

Love the feedback Greg. You’re absolutely right that I forgot to mention the main *reason* why we have redirects — cookies.

It’s also a huge limitation to fixing this problem, something I’m hoping to cover in the next two posts on the topic.

]]> By: yardley.ca » On redirects & avoiding them http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/comment-page-1/#comment-25909 yardley.ca » On redirects & avoiding them Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:25:13 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/02/11/redirects-and-integration-part-i-limitations/#comment-25909 [...] on Ads continues to show how the sausage is made in online advertising with a very detailed post on browser-based redirects. Go read [...] [...] on Ads continues to show how the sausage is made in online advertising with a very detailed post on browser-based redirects. Go read [...]

]]>