<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malvertisement on Expedia.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/11/23/malvertisement-on-expediacom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/11/23/malvertisement-on-expediacom/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about online advertising, ad networks &#038; other techie randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/11/23/malvertisement-on-expediacom/comment-page-1/#comment-59817</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/?p=309#comment-59817</guid>
		<description>Expedia is a scam. Clik on my name to read evidence of how they are scamming people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expedia is a scam. Clik on my name to read evidence of how they are scamming people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/11/23/malvertisement-on-expediacom/comment-page-1/#comment-59386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/?p=309#comment-59386</guid>
		<description>That sounds very nice, although fundamentally does little to solve the root of the problem -- unless you actually start publishing your findings.  By publishing I don&#039;t mean touting &quot;20,000 creatives stopped&quot;, but I mean posting screencaps and links of all the offending ads you have found so that the only show up once on one network, and not 100 times on 100 networks.  You guys have the resources to turn this into a community effort, and I hope you do so.

-Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds very nice, although fundamentally does little to solve the root of the problem &#8212; unless you actually start publishing your findings.  By publishing I don&#8217;t mean touting &#8220;20,000 creatives stopped&#8221;, but I mean posting screencaps and links of all the offending ads you have found so that the only show up once on one network, and not 100 times on 100 networks.  You guys have the resources to turn this into a community effort, and I hope you do so.</p>
<p>-Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/11/23/malvertisement-on-expediacom/comment-page-1/#comment-59381</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/?p=309#comment-59381</guid>
		<description>Ad quality is the biggest risk to our industry, and this is a perfect example. 

the Rubicon Project estimates that the absence of an across-the-board solution to filter unwanted ads can put up to 30% of publishers’ ad revenue at risk. Unwanted ads damage publishers&#039; brand value and reputation by creating a negative user experience - driving away site visitors and the revenue they bring; de-valuing ad rates, which handicaps sales teams&#039; ability to sell at rate card prices; and alienating premium advertisers whose quality creative can be degraded by placement next to an offending ad.

To spare publishers this headache, we launched the Ad Quality Protection Program a few weeks ago (http://tiny.cc/r4j98). If the rest of industry doesn&#039;t tackle this issue head-on, all the benefits of online advertising we&#039;ve been touting along the way - direct accountability, measurability, etc. - are for naught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ad quality is the biggest risk to our industry, and this is a perfect example. </p>
<p>the Rubicon Project estimates that the absence of an across-the-board solution to filter unwanted ads can put up to 30% of publishers’ ad revenue at risk. Unwanted ads damage publishers&#8217; brand value and reputation by creating a negative user experience &#8211; driving away site visitors and the revenue they bring; de-valuing ad rates, which handicaps sales teams&#8217; ability to sell at rate card prices; and alienating premium advertisers whose quality creative can be degraded by placement next to an offending ad.</p>
<p>To spare publishers this headache, we launched the Ad Quality Protection Program a few weeks ago (<a href="http://tiny.cc/r4j98" rel="nofollow">http://tiny.cc/r4j98</a>). If the rest of industry doesn&#8217;t tackle this issue head-on, all the benefits of online advertising we&#8217;ve been touting along the way &#8211; direct accountability, measurability, etc. &#8211; are for naught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff E</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/11/23/malvertisement-on-expediacom/comment-page-1/#comment-59352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/?p=309#comment-59352</guid>
		<description>This same ad was on Billboard.com on Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This same ad was on Billboard.com on Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Hardmeier</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/11/23/malvertisement-on-expediacom/comment-page-1/#comment-59305</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Hardmeier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeonads.com/?p=309#comment-59305</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a contact - can you send me the logs Mike?

Sandi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a contact &#8211; can you send me the logs Mike?</p>
<p>Sandi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

